Skip to content WebMD: Better Information. Better Health.
  • Bookmark This Page
  • Site Map
  • Sign up for WebMD Newsletters

This article is from the WebMD News Archive

Font Size
A
A
A

Virtual Colonoscopy Shows Promise

Study Shows It's Less Invasive and Possibly More Effective Than Conventional Screening
By Sid Kirchheimer
WebMD Health News

Dec. 1, 2003 -- Virtual colonoscopy -- a new, less-invasive method of screening for colon cancer and other bowel diseases -- is already known to be faster and less troublesome for patients than conventional colonoscopy. Now, a study shows it may also be slightly more effective.

In evaluating the two procedures in more than 1,200 patients -- all deemed to be at average risk of colon cancer -- researchers say the new three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy detected about 93% of polyps larger than 8 millimeters. By comparison, some 90% of polyps were detected when screening with conventional colonoscopy. Average risk patients had some risk factors for the development of colorectal cancer but did not have a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer diagnosed at an early age or two or more first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer diagnosed at any age.

"Our study suggests that virtual colonoscopy is at least as effective, if not more so," study researcher J. Richard Choi, MD, ScD, tells WebMD. "But it certainly is less invasive than the conventional method."

With the new procedure, radiologists can obtain 3-D images of the interior of the colon from different angles to detect polyps, diverticulosis, and cancer with computed tomography (CT), sometimes called a CAT scan. Patients lie on their back and a thin tube is inserted into the rectum. While holding their breath, the table moves through a scanner to produce a continuously rotating X-ray beam that provides cross-section images of the length of the colon. A computer program slices together these images to create a "movie-like" series of 3-D pictures viewed on the video screen. This scanning procedure is then repeated with patients lying on their stomach.

The entire procedure takes about 10 minutes and requires no sedation. With conventional colonoscopy, which can take up to an hour, patients must be sedated as a long, flexible tube with a miniature camera on its tip is snaked through the entire colon -- up to 6 feet. Because of the bowel's twists and turns, doctors must frequently inflate it with puffs of air to allow for better maneuverability.

"And when the procedure is over, they can drive themselves home because they haven't been sedated."

Both procedures require the same preparations -- avoiding solid food the day before the test and cleansing the bowel with laxatives to remove all fecal matter.

Choi's study, presented Monday before the Radiological Society of North America and published in this week's New England Journal of Medicine, is the first to test 3-D computed tomography as a screening method for colon cancer for average-risk people. But in recent years doctors have taken two-dimensional CT images of the colon, and studies have suggested these virtual 2-D images may be less sensitive at detecting polyps than conventional colonoscopy in a low-risk population.

webMD Video

click to expand/contract  Learn How to Reconnect Sexually

Sexual therapist Michael Perelman gives advice on how couples can reconnect sexually.

Watch Video

click to expand/contract  Statin Power

click to expand/contract  Sports Hernias

click to expand/contract  Sex After Prostate Cancer

click to expand/contract  Male Breast Reduction

Most Popular Stories